Legal Opinion

Myers v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 17, 1911No. 454PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Transferred from United States Circuit Court of Appeals, New York (T. D. 30470; 178 Fed. Rep., 462).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The merchandise involved in this case was invoiced as corundum ore concentrates. It is in fact a product of corundum, crushed and ground to different degrees of fineness, and divided into grades more or less uniform in* size. It was assessed for duty at the rate of 1 cent per pound as having a similitude to emery, ground, provided for by paragraph 419 of the tariff act of 1897, the pertinent provision of which reads as follows:

Emery grains, and emery manufactured, ground, pulverized, or refined, one cent per pound. * * *

The importer claims first that the merchandise- was subject to free entry…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Stone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Stengel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Protest 59116-K of J. T. Steeb & Co.United States Customs Court · 1946
  5. National Lead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API