Myers v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Transferred from United States Circuit Court of Appeals, New York (T. D. 30470; 178 Fed. Rep., 462).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
The merchandise involved in this case was invoiced as corundum ore concentrates. It is in fact a product of corundum, crushed and ground to different degrees of fineness, and divided into grades more or less uniform in* size. It was assessed for duty at the rate of 1 cent per pound as having a similitude to emery, ground, provided for by paragraph 419 of the tariff act of 1897, the pertinent provision of which reads as follows:
Emery grains, and emery manufactured, ground, pulverized, or refined, one cent per pound. * * *
The importer claims first that the merchandise- was subject to free entry…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Stone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Stengel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Protest 59116-K of J. T. Steeb & Co.United States Customs Court · 1946
- National Lead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.