Legal Opinion

Burn Strauss, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 9, 1969No. C.D. 3845PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Newman, Judge:

This case presents for our determination the proper tariff classification of certain steel articles described on the invoice as “Black Steel in Coils (Hemmed, Painted and Corrugated) 15" coil.” The merchandise was assessed with duty at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem under item 657.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States '(T'SUS) as “other” articles of iron or steel, not coated or plated with precious metal.

Plaintiff’s primary contention, as reflected by the claims made in its original protest under items 608.81, 608.82 and 609.12, is that the merchandise has not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. FrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Stengel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  2. Sandvik Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  3. W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  4. W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. O. A. Both Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API