Legal Opinion

United States v. Prosser

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 25, 1910No. 24PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a decision of the United States Board of General Appraisers, G. A. 6193 (T. D. 26835), T. D. 27493.

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Judge

Prosser & Son imported into New York 84 cast-steel grinding parts, weighing about 1,000 pounds each, to be used in certain kinds of mills for grinding in the manufacture of cement. Duty was assessed *23by the collector at 45 per cent ad valorem- under the provisions of paragraph 193 of the tariff act of July 24, 1897, which reads as follows:

Articles or wares not specially provided for in this act, composed wholly or in part of iron, steel, lead, copper, nickel, pewter, zinc, gold, silver, platinum, aluminum or other metal, and whether partly or wholly manufactured, forty-five per cent ad valorem.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Hedden v. RichardSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. FrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Lunham & Moore v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Stengel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Glazer Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API