Legal Opinion

Dejonge v. Magone

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 18, 1895No. 56PublishedCited by 19 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED áTATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The action below was brought to recover the amount of alleged excessive exactions imposed by the defendant, while collector of the port of New York, as duties upon 'two importations into the port of New York made by the plaintiffs in 1888, of two kinds of paper, the one coated, colored, and embossed to imitate leather; the other coated with flock to imitate velvet; which importations were…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED áTATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The action below was brought to recover the amount of alleged excessive exactions imposed by the defendant, while collector of the port of New York, as duties upon 'two importations into the port of New York made by the plaintiffs in 1888, of two kinds of paper, the one coated, colored, and embossed to imitate leather; the other coated with flock to imitate velvet; which importations were classified by the collector as dutiable under Schedule M of the tariff act of March 3, 1883, c. 121, 22 Stat. 488, 510,…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Write

The paragraph of the tariff act of March 3, 1883, c. 121, 22 Stat. 488, 510, under which the classification complained of was made, is contained in the statement of facts. It is contended by counsel for plaintiffs in error that it should be construed so as to read as follows:

“ Paper hangings and paper for screens or fireboards, paper antiquarian, demy, drawing, elephant, foolscap, imperial, letter, note, and all other. paper (of the class of paper anti guarían, demy, drawing,. elephant, foolscap, imperial, letter, and note) not specially enumerated or provided for in this act: twenty-five per…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Lawrence v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fink v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. United States v. Armature Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  3. United States v. RichterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  5. Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API