Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Painter

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 13, 1999No. Misc. (Subtitle AG) No. 25, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, through Bar Counsel and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709, 1 filed a Petition for Disciplinary Action against Richard E. Painter, the respondent, alleging that the respondent engaged in misconduct involving domestic violence and abuse of his wife and children. More particularly, the petitioner charged that the respondent violated Rule 8.4 2 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, Maryland Rule 16-812, Appendix: Rules of Professional Conduct of the Maryland Rules.

We referred the matter to the Honorable…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Coburn v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoldsboroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Rheb v. Bar Ass'n of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AlisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheinbeinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. RuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GreenleafCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API