Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Greenleaf

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 16, 2014No. 2ag/13PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

This attorney discipline proceeding concerns a Maryland lawyer who solicited for sexual acts a person whom the lawyer believed to be under the age of consent.

Robert John Greenleaf (“Greenleaf’), Respondent, while serving as the Chief Deputy Clerk of the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, used the Internet to solicit for sexual acts a law enforcement officer who was posing as a fourteen-year-old or fifteen-year-old girl. Greenleaf s actions came to the attention of the Attorney Grievance Commission (“the Commission”), Petitioner.

On March 14, 2013, in this Court, Bar Counsel filed a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheinbeinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Bishop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SinghCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Pedro Jimenez-Cedillo v. Jefferson Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API