Legal Opinion

Thorem v. Thorem

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 1933No. 29,137PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILTON, Justice.

Action for a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. At the close of the evidence judgment was ordered dismissing plaintiff’s complaint. The appeal was taken from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff and defendant were married December 29, 1920. Plaintiff was 38 years of age, defendant 40 years, at the time the action was commenced in January, 1932. There was no issue of the marriage. The court found as a fact:

“That during the married life of the parties considerable trouble arose between them, but that one was as much responsible therefor as the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maldaner v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Boardman v. LorentzenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Berg v. PenttilaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Ricker v. J. L. Owens Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Nornborg v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Retterath v. RetterathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Bieter Co. v. BlomquistDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  4. Hove v. HoveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API