Ricker v. J. L. Owens Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the former appeal reported in 149 Minn. 130, 182 N. W. 960, defendant J. L. Owens Company’s motion for a new trial was denied, Bárdwell, J. From the order denying this motion, both defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
This is an action for the rescission for fraud of a contract of purchase by the plaintiff of stock in the defendant J. L. Owens Manufacturing Company and for the recovery of the money paid. The trial court found the fraud charged. It found that the plaintiff was guilty of laches and for that reason denied a recovery. The plaintiff appealed to this court from an order denying her motion for a new trial, and the order was reversed. 149 Minn. 130, 182 N. W. 960. Afterwards the plaintiff moved in this court for an amendment of the order of reversal so as to direct the entry of judgment in her…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fuller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Daily v. St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Kies v. SearlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Smith v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Seibert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Worrlein v. MaierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Olson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Thorem v. ThoremSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- In Re Estate of HoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Rydeen v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.