Legal Opinion

Hove v. Hove

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 1945No. 34,013PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Youngdahl, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a judgment granting plaintiff an absolute divorce. The lower court found that both parties were guilty of cruel and inhuman treatment. The sole question raised on the appeal is whether the trial court was justified in granting plaintiff a divorce in view of the finding that he was guilty of cruel and inhuman treatment.

The court found defendant guilty of cruel and inhuman treatment with the following finding:

“That the defendant for a number of years past has treated the plaintiff in a cruel and inhuman manner; that such cruel and inhuman treatment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Longinotti v. LonginottiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  2. Duberstein v. DubersteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Blankenship v. BlankenshipNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Alexander v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Buerfening v. BuerfentngSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Kasal v. KasalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Bahr v. BahrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Anonymous v. AnonymousCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API