Legal Opinion
Berg v. Penttila
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 10, 1928No. 26,284PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a proceeding instituted by 25 voters under G. S. 1923, § 538, et seq. the corrupt practices act, to contest the right of Charles Penttila to the office of county commissioner of St. Louis county to which he was elected at the November, 1926, general election. • The court found seven material violations of the corrupt practices act and directed the entry of judgment declaring his election void, ousting him from office and declaring the office vacant. He appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The appellant makes these claims:(1) That he was deprived of his…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Will of Ball v. BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Leverett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- State v. ThadenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Maldaner v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Morris v. McClellanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Parker v. Hennepin County District Court, Fourth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. YoungquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Thorem v. ThoremSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Mariette v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Parker v. HENNEPIN CTY. DIST. CT., 4TH JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.