Legal Opinion
Bieter Co. v. Blomquist
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 29, 1994No. 3-89 CIV 759PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALSOP, Senior District Judge.
The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before this Court upon various motions by the parties in this case and upon the motions of the parties in several related cases. Among the motions heard by the Court was the Motion of Plaintiff Bieter Company for Partial Summary Judgment striking Defendants’ affirmative defenses of in pari delicto and unclean hands. The other motions heard are addressed in two separate Orders.
I. BACKGROUND
On April 15, 1993, Bieter filed a Third Amended Complaint against Defendants seeking damages pursuant to the Racketeer…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of PSA, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Schwartz v. the Upper Deck Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1997
- Bieter Co. v. BlomquistDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Roma Const. Co., Inc. v. aRUSSODistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1995
- Meadowbrook-Richman, Inc. v. Associated Financial Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.