Legal Opinion

Retterath v. Retterath

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1949No. File 7114PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimson, District J.

This is an action for divorce brought by the plaintiff on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment. The answer of the defendant sets up recrimination by way of cruel and inhuman treatment on the part of the plaintiff as a defense to the action. The trial court found for the defendant and dismissed the action. The plaintiff appeals to this court. In the settled statement of the case, however, no demand is made for a trial de novo nor is any question of fact specified on which a review is desired.

In § 28-2732, ND Rev Code 1943 it is provided that “A party desiring to appeal from a judgment in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hoellinger v. HoellingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Hiecke v. HieckeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State ex rel. McClory v. McGruerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Studley v. StudleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Voss v. VossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jones v. Boeing CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Anderson v. BlixtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Mevorah v. GoodmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Savre v. SavreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Belakjon v. HilstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API