Legal Opinion

Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSB

California Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 2004No. S105909PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

We granted review in this case to consider whether tort liability may be imposed for statements made when a citizen contacts law enforcement personnel to report suspected criminal activity on the part of another person. As we shall explain, we agree with the trial court, the Court of Appeal, and the great weight of authority in this state in concluding that such statements are privileged pursuant to Civil Code section 47, subdivision (b) (section 47(b)),1 and can be the basis for tort liability only if the plaintiff can establish the elements of the tort of malicious…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Rubin v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Mindys Cosmetics, Inc. v. DakarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API