Legal Opinion

Sand Springs R. Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 15, 1921No. 10357PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Supreme Court, Tulsa County; M. A. Breckenridge, Judge. Action by Roy Smith against the Sand ■Springs Railway Company for damages impersonal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, .and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal from the superior court of Tulsa county.

On the 5th day of May, 1913, Roy Smith, by his father and next friend, W. B. Smith, commenced an action in the superior court of Tulsa county against the Sand Springs Intel-urban Railway Company, as defendant, to' recover damages and for alleged person-, al injuries received by the said Roy Smith on the evening of July 4, 1912, while a passenger on one of defendant’s trolley cars.

Before the case was tried below, Roy Smith attained his majority and was, by the court, substituted as plaintiff in his own right, and on the 6th day of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. De VoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mid-Co Gasoline Co. v. BackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Roy v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Wetzel v. RixseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Beidleman v. BarrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Messman v. WiltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API