Arel v. T & L ENTERPRISES, INC.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Justice.
This case asks the Court to consider the meaning of “accident” in I.C. § 72-701 and to consider'whether I.C. § 72-701 is constitutional. We affirm the decision of the Idaho Industrial Commission and hold that I.C. § 72-701 is constitutional.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellant Robert L. Arel was employed by Respondent T & L Enterprises, Inc. (T & L). After a non-work related “startle” in February or March 2004, Arel experienced pain “posteriorly just behind the humerus.” On November 27, 2004, while performing his job with T & L, Arel slipped on a log and fell. Arel…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Moody v. State Highway DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Carrier v. Lake Pend Oreille School District 84Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Venters v. Sorrento Delaware, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Van TineIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Re: Thermination of Parental Rights (mother)Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Arambarri v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Wernecke v. St. Maries Joint School District 401Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Citizens Against Range Expansion v. Idaho Fish & Game DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Neel v. Western Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.