Legal Opinion

Arel v. T & L ENTERPRISES, INC.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2008No. 34562PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This case asks the Court to consider the meaning of “accident” in I.C. § 72-701 and to consider'whether I.C. § 72-701 is constitutional. We affirm the decision of the Idaho Industrial Commission and hold that I.C. § 72-701 is constitutional.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant Robert L. Arel was employed by Respondent T & L Enterprises, Inc. (T & L). After a non-work related “startle” in February or March 2004, Arel experienced pain “posteriorly just behind the humerus.” On November 27, 2004, while performing his job with T & L, Arel slipped on a log and fell. Arel…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Moody v. State Highway DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Carrier v. Lake Pend Oreille School District 84Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Venters v. Sorrento Delaware, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Van TineIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Re: Thermination of Parental Rights (mother)Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Arambarri v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Wernecke v. St. Maries Joint School District 401Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Citizens Against Range Expansion v. Idaho Fish & Game DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Neel v. Western Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API