Legal Opinion

Citizens Against Range Expansion v. Idaho Fish & Game Department

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2012No. 39297PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

The Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) appeals the district court’s post-judgment orders (1) refusing to lift a portion of an injunction and (2) declaring the Idaho Outdoor Sport Shooting Range Act unconstitutional. We reverse both orders and remand the case for further proceedings.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Farragut Shooting Range, near Bay-view, Idaho, has been owned and operated by IDFG since World War II. It sits on approximately 160 acres and is surrounded by a residential neighborhood, a public road, and hiking trails. Public use of the range has been…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. DirecTV, Inc. v. LetoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. Jones v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Garcia v. Yonkers School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Kirkland v. Blaine County Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Guzman v. Piercy / Canyon County / SuttonIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Susan C. Vierstra v. Michael George VierstraIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Jones v. LynnIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Lepper v. Eastern Idaho Health Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Snap! Mobile v. Vertical RaiseIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API