Citizens Against Range Expansion v. Idaho Fish & Game Department
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
J. JONES, Justice.
The Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) appeals the district court’s post-judgment orders (1) refusing to lift a portion of an injunction and (2) declaring the Idaho Outdoor Sport Shooting Range Act unconstitutional. We reverse both orders and remand the case for further proceedings.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The Farragut Shooting Range, near Bay-view, Idaho, has been owned and operated by IDFG since World War II. It sits on approximately 160 acres and is surrounded by a residential neighborhood, a public road, and hiking trails. Public use of the range has been…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- DirecTV, Inc. v. LetoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Jones v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Garcia v. Yonkers School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Kirkland v. Blaine County Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Guzman v. Piercy / Canyon County / SuttonIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Susan C. Vierstra v. Michael George VierstraIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Jones v. LynnIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
- Lepper v. Eastern Idaho Health Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Snap! Mobile v. Vertical RaiseIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.