Moody v. State Highway Department
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.
This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. (Title 43, Chapters 9 to 19, inch, I. C. A.)
January 15, 1933, respondent W. G. Moody, while working for appellant State Highway Department of the state of Idaho, as surface inspector, frosted the great toe on his right foot. He applied home remedies to the injured toe, after completing his shift that day, and the next day returned to work, without loss of time, and within a day or so thereafter, made verbal report of his injury to his super intendent. He continued with his work, and continued to apply the home treatments to his toe,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Farmer v. Bieber-Goodman CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- White v. Louisiana Western Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Smith v. McHan Hardware Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by35 opinions
- Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
- Swensen v. Buildings, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. RaynerIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- United Pacific Insurance v. BakesIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Rivera v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.