Legal Opinion

Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Van Tine

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1999No. 24723PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a counterclaim seeking damages against a worker’s compensation surety for breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing arising out of the surety’s subrogation claim. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Facts

On January 30, 1990, appellant Kerby Van Tine (Van Tine) was injured during the course of his employment with the Idaho Department of Transportation when the vehicle he was driving was struck by a semi-truck. Van Tine submitted a worker’s compensation claim to his employer’s worker’s compensation surety, respondent Idaho…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. White v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Meisner v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial CouncilIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lovey v. Régence BlueShield of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Inama v. Boise County Ex Rel. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Venters v. Sorrento Delaware, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Struhs v. Protection Technologies, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API