Legal Opinion
Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided May 13, 2016No. Case No. 2:15-CV-1202-WCBPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. BRYSON, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE
Before the Court is the motion of defendant Eli Lilly & Co. (“Lilly”) for a protective order. Dkt. No. 88. The motion is DENIED.
A. Background
In the course of discovery in this case, the plaintiff, Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR (“UroPep”) served Lilly with a set of 18 interrogatories. Pursuant to Rule 26(c), Fed. R. Civ. P., Lilly has moved the Court for a protective order striking UroPep’s interrogatories and requiring UroPep to serve new interrogatories in compliance with Rule 33, Fed. R. Civ. P., and the Court’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Safeco v. RawstronDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Williams v. Board of County Commissioners of the Unified Government of Wyandotte CountyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Kendall v. Ges Exposition Services, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1997
- Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Trevino v. ACB American, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Synopsys, Inc. v. ATopTech, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Abarca v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2025
- Anderson News, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Anderson News, LLC and Don A. Beskrone - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Finjan, LLC v. Qualys Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.