Legal Opinion

Kendall v. Ges Exposition Services, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided August 8, 1997No. CV-S-96-414-RLHPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HUNT, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery (# 37, filed June 9, 1997). It is accompanied by an Affidavit of Edgar Carranza, Esq. (#38) which purports to show good faith attempts to confer with Defendant to secure disclosure prior to intervention by the Court. GES’s Opposition (#43) was filed July 11, 1997. Plaintiff’s Reply (# 45) was filed August 1,1997.

The dispute arises from the interpretation and application of Local Rule 33 — 1(b)1 and *685Fed.R.Civ.P. 33(a) to “discrete subparts” of interrogatories. The Court finds that both parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ginn v. Gemini Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1991
  2. Lawrence v. First Kansas Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  3. Valdez v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1991

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Safeco v. RawstronDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
  2. Leaffer v. ZarlengoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  4. Mezu v. Morgan State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  5. Trevino v. ACB American, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API