Kendall v. Ges Exposition Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HUNT, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery (# 37, filed June 9, 1997). It is accompanied by an Affidavit of Edgar Carranza, Esq. (#38) which purports to show good faith attempts to confer with Defendant to secure disclosure prior to intervention by the Court. GES’s Opposition (#43) was filed July 11, 1997. Plaintiff’s Reply (# 45) was filed August 1,1997.
The dispute arises from the interpretation and application of Local Rule 33 — 1(b)1 and *685Fed.R.Civ.P. 33(a) to “discrete subparts” of interrogatories. The Court finds that both parties…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ginn v. Gemini Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1991
- Lawrence v. First Kansas Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Valdez v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1991
3Cited by41 opinions
- Safeco v. RawstronDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Leaffer v. ZarlengoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Mezu v. Morgan State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Trevino v. ACB American, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.