Synopsys, Inc. v. ATopTech, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER
Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”) filed a joint discovery letter in which Sy-nopsys moves to compel ATopTech to respond to interrogatories. [Docket No. 811 (Joint Letter) ]. ATopTech argues that it already answered Synopsys’s Set One, Interrogatory Nos. 1-5, which contains at least 21 discrete subparts. As such, ATopTech contends that it is not required to respond to any of the interrogatories in Set Two, Interrogatory Nos. 6-25, because the Set Two interrogatories also…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Safeco v. RawstronDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Keranos, LLC v. Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- United States ex rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Superior Communications v. Earhugger, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- David Wayne Wilson v. Lura Merritt, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Edward B. Spencer v. Stuart Sherman, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- International Petroleum Products and Additives Company, Inc. v. Black Gold S.A.R.L.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Licea v. Beshay Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Martifer-Silverado Fund I, LLC v. Zhongli Science and Technology Group Co., LtdDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.