Legal Opinion

Synopsys, Inc. v. ATopTech, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 16, 2016No. Case No. 13-cv-02965-MMC(DMR)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER

Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”) filed a joint discovery letter in which Sy-nopsys moves to compel ATopTech to respond to interrogatories. [Docket No. 811 (Joint Letter) ]. ATopTech argues that it already answered Synopsys’s Set One, Interrogatory Nos. 1-5, which contains at least 21 discrete subparts. As such, ATopTech contends that it is not required to respond to any of the interrogatories in Set Two, Interrogatory Nos. 6-25, because the Set Two interrogatories also…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Safeco v. RawstronDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
  2. Keranos, LLC v. Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  3. Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  4. United States ex rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  5. Superior Communications v. Earhugger, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. David Wayne Wilson v. Lura Merritt, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  2. Edward B. Spencer v. Stuart Sherman, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  3. International Petroleum Products and Additives Company, Inc. v. Black Gold S.A.R.L.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. Licea v. Beshay Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
  5. Martifer-Silverado Fund I, LLC v. Zhongli Science and Technology Group Co., LtdDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API