Legal Opinion

Trevino v. ACB American, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 27, 2006No. C05-00239 JF(HRL)PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

LLOYD, United States Magistrate Judge.

On January 24, 2006, this court heard plaintiffs’ motions to compel further discovery responses and production of documents. Based on the papers submitted and the arguments of counsel, the court issues the following order.

I. Background

Elizabeth Trevino (“Trevino”) and Yadira Rios (“Rios”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, filed a complaint on January 14, 2005, alleging that defendants ACB American, Inc. (“ACB”) and Hilco…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
  2. Safeco v. RawstronDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
  3. In Re Remington Arms Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. Kendall v. Ges Exposition Services, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1997
  5. Compaq Computer Corp. v. Packard Bell Electronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Superior Communications v. Earhugger, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
  3. Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2016
  4. Green v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
  5. Adlerstein v. United States Customs and Border ProtectionDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API