Legal Opinion
Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-Arms
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 3, 2004No. CIV.A. Nos. 03-56HHKJMF, 03-868HHKJMF, 03-2080HHKJMFPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This Title VII case has now generated eighteen motions that must be resolved. The motions fall into two categories. First, there are procedural motions, some of which ask the presiding judge, Judge Kennedy, to modify deadlines he has set for the end of discovery and the filing of dispositive motions. These motions are not before me, but I have resolved others that seek the modification of deadlines pertaining to discovery motions. Second, there are discovery motions filed by the parties seeking various forms of relief and they are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Burns v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Richard Thorn and Pat Curran v. Sundstrand Aerospace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Arcenio E. Garcia v. Pueblo Country ClubCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Scott v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Tri-State Hospital Supply Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Mezu v. Morgan State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Superior Communications v. Earhugger, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Banks v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.