Legal Opinion

Dowker v. Peacock

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1986No. Docket 84605PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this legal malpractice action, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for accelerated judgment under GCR 1963, 116.1(5), ruling that the period of limitation had already expired. Plaintiff appeals as of right.

The alleged malpractice arose out of plaintiffs attempts to recover payment from Wayne Harding for construction work done on his home by plaintiffs business. In February, 1980, defendants filed both a claim of lien on the Harding property and a lawsuit against Wayne Harding in circuit court. We have not been apprised of the exact nature of this lawsuit. The lien, which defendants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sawabini v. DesenbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Luick v. RademacherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Basic Food Industries, Inc. v. Travis, Warren, Nayer & BurgoyneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Biberstine v. WoodworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Berry v. ZismanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Stroud v. WardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Chapman v. SullivanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Hooper v. Hill LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. K73 CORPORATION v. StancatiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API