Legal Opinion

K73 CORPORATION v. Stancati

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1988No. Docket 99578PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) on the ground that the statute of limitations barred plaintiffs’ legal malpractice claim. We affirm.

Plaintiff Lawrence Pook, sole shareholder and president of plaintiff K73 Corporation, filed the instant complaint on September 21, 1984, against defendant, Ross F. Stancati, an attorney he hired to represent him in the sale of his dry cleaning business. (For ease in reading, we will refer to the singular plaintiff and defendant, Lawrence Pook and Ross Stancati,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. SullivanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Dowker v. PeacockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Gambino v. CardamoneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stevens v. LakeMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mitchell v. DoughertyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Seebacher v. Fitzgerald, Hodgman, Cawthorne & King, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Nugent v. WeedMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Kloian v. SchwartzMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API