Legal Opinion

Stroud v. Ward

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1988No. Docket 94908PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCynar, P.J.

Defendant appeals by leave granted from an order denying his motion for summary disposition. We reverse.

This is a case of legal malpractice. In September or November, 1975, the plaintiff contacted and retained defendant to pursue a lawsuit against plaintiff’s employer, the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., for alleged employment discrimination and harassment.

The lawsuit was never filed. As a result, on August 14, 1978, plaintiff filed with the Attorney Grievance Committee a request for investigation of defendant’s failure to pursue his claim against A & p. Defendant filed an answer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lumber Village, Inc v. SieglerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Draws v. LevinMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Barnard v. DilleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Weast v. DuffieMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Chapman v. SullivanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Becherer v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Witherspoon v. GuilfordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Seyburn, Kahn, Ginn, Bess, Deitch & Serlin, PC v. BakshiMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Maddox v. BurlingameMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Aldred v. O'Hara-BruceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API