Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Sullivan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1987No. Docket 94106PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from the July 7, 1986, order of summary disposition in favor of defendant. The Ingham Circuit Court found that plaintiff’s claim of attorney malpractice was barred by the statute of limitations.

Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on April 4, 1986, against defendant, George Sullivan, an attorney she had hired to represent her in the sale of a restaurant and tavern business. Plaintiff alleged that defendant improperly drafted one or more documents of sale, failed to protect the security interest in certain personal property, and failed to draft the reassignment agreement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Luick v. RademacherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State Bar of Michigan v. DaggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Lipton v. BoeskyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Basic Food Industries, Inc. v. Travis, Warren, Nayer & BurgoyneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Biberstine v. WoodworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kloian v. SchwartzMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Ameriwood Industries International Corp. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
  3. Maddox v. BurlingameMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Stroud v. WardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Mitchell v. DoughertyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API