Legal Opinion

Biberstine v. Woodworth

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1979No. Docket 61399PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

We are asked to decide when the statute of limitations 1 begins to run in a malpractice case involving an attorney’s inaction in failing to schedule a debt owed by this plaintiff in a petition for personal bankruptcy. The circuit court granted an accelerated judgment for the defendant after it found the statute of limitations had run. The Court of Appeals reversed 2 and we affirm, finding the statute of limitations starts to run at the time the plaintiff is discharged in bankruptcy.

The plaintiff retained the defendant to file a personal bankruptcy in 1970. The original petition was filed in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dyke v. RichardMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Biberstine v. WoodworthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sam v. BalardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Ameraccount Club, Inc. v. HillTennessee Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API