Gebhardt v. O'ROURKE
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.
In this interlocutory appeal, we consider whether plaintiff Barbara Gebhardt’s attorney malpractice suit is barred by the statute of limitations. The trial judge granted defendant attorney Jerome O’Rourke’s motion for summary disposition on the ground that the plaintiff had not filed her malpractice complaint within two years of the attorney’s last day of professional service or within six months after discovering the existence of her claim. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the complaint was timely filed because the cause of action did not accrue until the judgment of acquittal in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Carmel v. LunneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Glenn v. AikenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by175 opinions
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Odom v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. SealsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.