Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Burns

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 2006No. OBAD No. 1679. SCBD No. 5144PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.

1 In this proceeding against a lawyer for imposition of professional discipline we are asked to decide whether six months suspension from the practice of law together with two years supervised probation and assessment of costs is the appropriate disciplinary sanction for this respondent's professional misconduct. We find that it is and we adopt the recommendation of the Professional Responsibility Tribunal, (PRT).

I

T2 On December 16, 2005, the Oklahoma Bar Association, (complainant), filed a complaint pursuant to Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, (RGDP), 5 ©.S$.2001, ch.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. McBrideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BERNHARDTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McArthurSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. IJAMSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API