Meemken v. O'HARA
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Dell, Chief Justice.
This is an action for damages arising out of a breach of promise to marry claimed to have been made in the spring of 1952. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for $10,000. Defendant appeals from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
Only those facts will be stated which we deem necessary to a. consideration of the issues involved, and pursuant to the well-established rule they will be stated in the light most favorable to-the verdict. 2 The plaintiff, 34 years of age, first met the defendant in August 1945 in St.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Dyer v. LalorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Kugling v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Morgan v. MuenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Brannan v. ShertzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Mund v. MundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Fulsom v. EgnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- State v. E. A. H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.