Legal Opinion

Meemken v. O'HARA

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 5, 1954No. 36,294PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

This is an action for damages arising out of a breach of promise to marry claimed to have been made in the spring of 1952. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for $10,000. Defendant appeals from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

Only those facts will be stated which we deem necessary to a. consideration of the issues involved, and pursuant to the well-established rule they will be stated in the light most favorable to-the verdict. 2 The plaintiff, 34 years of age, first met the defendant in August 1945 in St.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Dyer v. LalorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  3. Kugling v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Morgan v. MuenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Brannan v. ShertzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Mund v. MundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Fulsom v. EgnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. State v. E. A. H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API