Legal Opinion

Trovatten v. Hanson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1927No. 25,961PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Appeal from an order granting judgment pursuant to an alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

The action was in replevin. The complaint alleges plaintiff’s ownership in general terms. The answer contains a general denial and specific defenses, and alleges that defendant executed a note secured by a chattel mortgage on the property involved, and that plaintiff claimed the property by virtue of a renewal of said note and mortgage. There is no reply. Over the objection of plaintiff, defendant was permitted to prove payment.

When a plaintiff alleges title generally to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nadeau v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Adamson v. WigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Kies v. SearlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Parker v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Central Metropolitan Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Austin v. RoseckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Davies v. Land O' Lakes Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API