Hayward v. Premo
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.
Petitioner, who was convicted of aggravated murder (among other offenses) and sentenced to death, appeals from a judgment dismissing his latest petition for post-conviction relief on the ground that it was untimely and improperly successive, contrary to both ORS 138.510(3), which requires a post-conviction petition to be filed within two years of the completion of the direct appeal process, and ORS 138.550, which requires all grounds for relief to be asserted in a petitioner’s first post-conviction proceeding.1 Petitioner acknowledges that his petition is untimely and successive. He argues,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Palmer v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Verduzco v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Holger v. IrishOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Young v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zsarko v. AngelozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Stokes v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Corona v. AmsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- White v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Gilderson v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.