Legal Opinion

Hayward v. Premo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 14, 2016No. 14C10686; A159204PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

Petitioner, who was convicted of aggravated murder (among other offenses) and sentenced to death, appeals from a judgment dismissing his latest petition for post-conviction relief on the ground that it was untimely and improperly successive, contrary to both ORS 138.510(3), which requires a post-conviction petition to be filed within two years of the completion of the direct appeal process, and ORS 138.550, which requires all grounds for relief to be asserted in a petitioner’s first post-conviction proceeding.1 Petitioner acknowledges that his petition is untimely and successive. He argues,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Palmer v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Verduzco v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Holger v. IrishOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Young v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zsarko v. AngelozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Stokes v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Corona v. AmsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. White v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. Gilderson v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API