Legal Opinion

Young v. Hill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2009No. CC 06125536P; CA A136732; SC S056820PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

This post-conviction case requires us to determine whether ORS 138.525, which governs meritless petitions for post-conviction relief, requires petitioner’s appeal to be dismissed. That statute provides:

“(1) The court may, on its own motion or on the motion of the defendant, enter a judgment denying a meritless petition brought under ORS 138.510 to 138.680.
“(2) As used in this section, ‘meritless petition’ means one that, when liberally construed, fails to state a claim upon which post-conviction relief may be granted.
“(3) Notwithstanding ORS 138.650, a judgment dismissing a meritless petition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mueller v. BenningOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Holger v. IrishOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Westfall v. Rust International & Underwriters Adjusting Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Datt v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Ogle v. NoothOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. NixOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Ogle v. NoothOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Breece v. AmsberryUmatilla County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API