Gilderson v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, P. J.
*497Petitioner appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief with prejudice. However, the judgment is a "judgment dismissing a meritless petition" within the meaning of ORS 138.525(3).1 Consequently, it is not appealable and we must dismiss.
Petitioner initiated this proceeding by filing a pro se petition for post-conviction relief. The petition alleged 11 grounds on which petitioner asserted that his conviction should be set aside. The post-conviction court appointed counsel for petitioner under ORS 138.590. After evaluating the case, petitioner's post-conviction counsel…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Datt v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Young v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Hayward v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016