Legal Opinion

Gilderson v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 28, 2017No. A161248Published

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, P. J.

*497Petitioner appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief with prejudice. However, the judgment is a "judgment dismissing a meritless petition" within the meaning of ORS 138.525(3).1 Consequently, it is not appealable and we must dismiss.

Petitioner initiated this proceeding by filing a pro se petition for post-conviction relief. The petition alleged 11 grounds on which petitioner asserted that his conviction should be set aside. The post-conviction court appointed counsel for petitioner under ORS 138.590. After evaluating the case, petitioner's post-conviction counsel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Datt v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Young v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Hayward v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API