Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Cain

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 16, 2020No. A164125PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

473 Submitted May 6, 2019, affirmed September 16, 2020, petition for review denied February 4, 2021 ( 367 Or 535) EDWARD HARVEY STOKES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Brad CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent. Malheur County Circuit Court 12109681P; A164125

475 P3d 110

One week before petitioner’s post-conviction trial, petitioner’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw, representing that he had a mandatory duty to do so under the Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct. Then, the morning of the hearing, petitioner filed a motion to continue the trial so as to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Church v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bogle v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Miller v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. M. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  2. Inman v. BowserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API