Legal Opinion

Corona v. Amsberry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 22, 2017No. CV132097; A156160PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, C. J.

Petitioner was convicted of multiple crimes in 2006 and sentenced to a lengthy period of incarceration. He initiated this post-conviction proceeding in 2013 by filing a pro se claim for post-conviction relief in which he raised a single claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, premised on several alleged deficiencies in representation. The post-conviction court dismissed that petition before appointing counsel to represent petitioner, and petitioner appeals. For the reasons set out below, we conclude that the post-conviction judgment is not appealable. Accordingly, we dismiss.

Petition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Young v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Breece v. AmsberryUmatilla County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. Hayward v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dawson v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API