Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Ryan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 20, 2012No. 10-1001PublishedCited by 3,904 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

The State of Arizona does not permit a convicted person alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel to raise that claim on direct review. Instead, the prisoner must bring the claim in state collateral proceedings. In the instant case, *5however, petitioner’s postconviction counsel did not raise the ineffective-assistance claim in the first collateral proceeding, and, indeed, filed a statement that, after reviewing the case, she found no meritorious claims helpful to petitioner. On federal habeas review, and with new counsel, petitioner sought to argue he had received ineffective assistance…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3,904 opinions

  1. Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. Davila v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Shinn v. Martinez RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2022

3,899 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API