Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Universal Oil Land Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1941No. Civ. 2750PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

On October 11, 1937, plaintiff filed her original complaint in this action to establish a trust in oil royalties in her favor and to quiet her title to the royalties. A second amended complaint was filed on March 17, 1939, to which general and special demurrers to each of the three causes of action were sustained without leave to amend, after counsel for plaintiff had stated to the trial court that there were no facts in addition to those alleged that could be pleaded to support plaintiff’s ease. The trial court granted the motion for judgment on the pleadings made by certain defendants. This…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Chavez v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Zakaessian v. ZakaessianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Torgeson v. ConnellyWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Dame v. MileskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  4. South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Wilson v. Loew's Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API