Legal Opinion

Dame v. Mileski

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1959No. 2848PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION.

2Opinion of the Court · ParkerJustice Parker

This is a suit to quiet title and to adjudicate the rights of the parties in a 1 percent overriding royalty interest in the oil and gas in certain Big Horn County lands. According to the uncontradicted evidence, D. L. McDonald and Stanley T. Wallbank were owners of a United States oil and gas lease on the lands. They assigned it to others, reserving a 1 percent overriding royalty in each McDonald and Wallbank; McDonald thereafter conveyed his 1 percent overriding royalty interest in the same lands three different times as follows:(1) To R. D. Dame on February 11, 1952, which…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jacoby v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. State v. SnyderWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Denver Joint Stock Land Bank of Denver v. DixonWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Oregon Basin Oil and Gas Company v. Ohio Oil CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by34 opinions

  1. Yeik v. Department of Revenue & TaxationWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Torgeson v. ConnellyWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Pine Creek Canal No. 1 v. StadlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Page v. Fees-Krey, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. Ferguson v. Coronado Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API