Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Delanney

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1988No. 9614PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLEIL, Justice.

In Southwestern Bell Telephone Company’s appeal from a judgment on a verdict finding that it negligently damaged Eugene Delanney, Southwestern Bell raises issues concerning the questions asked of the jury, the denial of its motions for a directed verdict and a new trial, the enforceability of a contractual limitation and the sufficiency of the evidence. We find no error affecting the trial court’s judgment and affirm.

Delanney operated Delanney & Associates, a real estate firm in Galveston, which had successfully advertised in Southwestern Bell’s Yellow Pages. In April of 1980,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ScharrenbeckTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  4. White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. International Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DeLanneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. City of Princeton v. Abbott, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  3. Fox Electric Co. v. Tone Guard Security, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Decision Control Systems, Inc. v. Personnel Cost Control, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. City National Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API