Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DeLanney

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1991No. C-8282PublishedCited by 637 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.

We consider whether a cause of action for negligence is stated by an allegation that a telephone company negligently failed to perform its contract to publish a Yellow Pages advertisement. The court of appeals held that the company’s failure to perform its contract was a basis for recovery in tort as well as contract, and that the clause limiting the telephone company’s liability could not apply to limit tort damages. 762 S.W.2d 772. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and render judgment in favor of Bell.

Facts

Eugene DeLanney advertised his real…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ScharrenbeckTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Ramos v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DelanneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by637 opinions

  1. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. S&w Enterprises, L.L.C., a Nevada Limited Liability Company v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama, Na, an Alabama Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. DeWitt County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In Re Halliburton Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002

632 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API