Legal Opinion

City of Princeton v. Abbott

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 16, 1990No. 05-89-00527-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

OVARD, Justice.

Our opinion dated March 19, 1990, is hereby withdrawn, and this opinion on the City of Princeton’s motion for rehearing is substituted in its place.

The City of Princeton (the City) appeals a jury verdict rendered in favor of Tonnie Abbott and Mildred Abbott (the Abbotts) involving the responsibility for water damage incurred by the Abbotts. This is the second time this Court has had the opportunity to hear this case. See Abbott v. City of Princeton, Texas, 721 S.W.2d 872 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1986, writ ref’d n.r.e.). The first time this case came to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Roark v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Price v. Short, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  2. Vaughn v. Drennon, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
  3. Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. Cameron, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  4. Dalon v. City of DeSoto, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  5. Keeney v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API