Legal Opinion

Mobil Chemical Company v. Bell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1974No. B-4447PublishedCited by 305 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Justice.

This is a common law damage suit for personal injuries sustained by Edward L. Bell and J. A. Hurley, employees of an independent contractor constructing a large chemical plant for Mobil Chemical Company, when acetic acid escaped from a portion of the plant already completed and turned over to Mobil. A jury failed to find that Mobil was guilty of specific acts of negligence but answered res ipsa loqui-tur issues favorably to the plaintiffs.1 Based on these findings, judgment was entered that each plaintiff recover $12,000 from Mobil. The court of civil appeals has held, inter…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ScharrenbeckTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. McCray v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Pittsburg Coca-Cola Bottling Works of Pittsburg v. PonderTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Honea, by Next Friend v. Coca Cola Bot. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by305 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Island Recreational Development Corp. v. Republic of Texas Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hyundai Motor Co. v. Rodriguez Ex Rel. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Lampasas v. Spring Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999

300 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API