Legal Opinion

Meacham v. Montgomery County Board of Education

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 16, 1982No. 8119SC1353PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The sole question presented for review is whether the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict against the plaintiff. For the reasons set forth below, we find that the directed verdict was erroneously allowed.

In Meacham v. Board of Education, 47 N.C. App. 271, 267 S.E. 2d 349 (1980) (Meacham I), this Court found disputed issues of material fact as to whether defendant should be estopped from denying plaintiff her status as a “career teacher.”

The following facts were found to raise a permissible inference that the elements of estoppel were present, and sufficiently so,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Husketh v. Convenient Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jones v. GwynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Parker v. Thompson-Arthur Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Miller v. TaltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Pierce v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Ferguson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API