Legal Opinion

Carondelet Health Network v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 12, 2009No. 2 CA-SA 2009-0019PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VÁSQUEZ, Judge.

¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner Caron-delet Health Network challenges the respondent judge’s order requiring Carondelet to disclose the name, address, and telephone number of a hospital patient who, while sharing a room with fellow patient Dudley Atte-berry, witnessed events that preceded Dudley’s death. Carondelet claims the physician-patient privilege bars disclosure of the witness’s identity.

¶ 2 “When a trial court orders disclosures that a party or witness believes to be protected by a privilege, appeal provides no remedy. Special action is the proper means to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Rudnick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. Ledvina v. CerasaniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Ziegler v. Super. Ct. in and for Cty. of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Azore, LLC v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Lear v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. Schoeneweis v. HamnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API