Carondelet Health Network v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VÁSQUEZ, Judge.
¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner Caron-delet Health Network challenges the respondent judge’s order requiring Carondelet to disclose the name, address, and telephone number of a hospital patient who, while sharing a room with fellow patient Dudley Atte-berry, witnessed events that preceded Dudley’s death. Carondelet claims the physician-patient privilege bars disclosure of the witness’s identity.
¶ 2 “When a trial court orders disclosures that a party or witness believes to be protected by a privilege, appeal provides no remedy. Special action is the proper means to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Rudnick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Ledvina v. CerasaniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Ziegler v. Super. Ct. in and for Cty. of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Azore, LLC v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Lear v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Schoeneweis v. HamnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.