Legal Opinion

Rudnick v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1974No. L.A. 30254PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

Petitioner Jacqueline Rudnick seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent superior court to vacate an order made during the course of discovery proceedings insofar as such order denied her motion for the production of certain adverse drug reaction reports and to enter an order for the production of said reports in full.

Petitioner (hereafter plaintiff) commenced against real parties in interest Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc. and The Stuart Company (hereafter defendants) the underlying action for damages for personal injuries. The complaint in essence alleges that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Oceanside Union School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Roberts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Daly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hogya v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. GherardiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Matchett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API