Legal Opinion

Ziegler v. Super. Ct. in and for Cty. of Pima

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 15, 1982No. 2 CA-CIV 4503PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

Petitioner is the plaintiff in a pending medical malpractice action in Pima County Superior Court. The real parties in interest, Rogers and DeVito, doctors of osteopathy specializing in cardiology, and Tucson General Hospital, an Arizona corporation which operates an osteopathic hospital in Tucson, are defendants. The basis of petitioner’s claim against the doctors was the unnecessary implantation of a pacemaker. Her claim against the hospital was for breach of its duty to supervise and control the administration of medical services within its facility in that it…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Purcell v. ZimbelmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  2. Tucson Medical Center, Incorporated v. MisevchArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Parkson v. Central DuPage HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Rudnick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Community Hospital Ass'n v. DIST. CT., ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Terre Haute Regional Hospital, Inc. v. TruebloodIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Baptist Mem. Hosp. v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API