Legal Opinion
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Reinstein
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 11, 2016No. 1 CA-SA 16-0096PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWE, Judge:
¶ 1 Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. and John D’Anna (collectively, “PNI”) seek special action relief from the trial court’s order denying its motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum. PNI argues that because the affidavit accompanying the subpoena for D’Anna’s interview notes did not satisfy Arizona’s Media Subpoena Law, A.R.S. § 12-2214, PNI was not required to disclose the information to Gary Michael Moran, the real party in interest. Specifically, and as relevant to our disposition of this special action, PNI argues that Moran has not exhausted all available sources for the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- Mark v. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Edward J. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Ronald J. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- William T. Farr v. Peter J. Pitchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Albert Gonzales and Mary Gonzales, Deputy Darrell Pierce v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.