Legal Opinion

City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1951No. S. F. 18264PublishedCited by 233 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

James Hession brought an action for personal injuries against the City and County of San Francis'’'" and the Western Pacific Railroad Company. He alleged tha he suffered brain concussion, nerve root damage, and nervous shock. At the request of Hession’s attorneys, Dr. Joseph Catton, a physician specializing in nervous and mental diseases, twice gave Hession-a neurological and psychiatric ex-

amination. In his deposition Dr. Cation testified that there was no physician-patient relationship between him and Hession; that he did not advise or treat Hession; that the sole purpose of the examination…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Hager v. ShindlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by233 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. The People v. SpeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. GuruleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

228 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API